| READ MAIN PAGE | RSS Feed | RSS Comments | Log in | |
Source: NW Progressive Institute He’s referring to an amendment to a bill that would have allowed US consumers to buy prescription drugs from other countries, often at significantly lower costs. The amendment, in other words, effectively rendered the bill useless. Never a more poignant, vicious appropriateness for the political jargon, “poison pill amendment.” The bill, thus neutered, was defeated 49-40. And everybody took their payoffs and went home happy. Except, of course, the American healthcare consumers, who continue to be screwed by astronomical pharmaceutical costs. Leave your own comment |
Pharma Resources
Health Lies Exposed Vaccination News Quackpot Watch Pharma Watch Drug Injury Blog Evidence of Harm Dr. Mercola Vaccine Truth Whistleblowers Law Busting Big Pharma Fraud: Antidepressants
Pharma News
Bullying big pharma pressures Australians Fingering Big Pharma in Philadelphia Free Speech Banned by Big Pharma Pharma Focus Blacklisting honest researchers Pharmaceutical fraud cases Pharmaceutical fraud charges
Pharma Scandals
August's Big Pharma Scandals Reputation of FDA in shambles: Vioxx scandal Behind the Paxil Scandals Vioxx scandal: deeper industry issues NESIRITIDE, a marketing scandal? Hit the drug lords in their pocket book! Big Pharma, quackbusters and 60 Minutes The NIH Scandal and the Future of AIDS Research |
If you have verifiable information or a warning you would like to see added to this web-site then please contact our team at
World Wide Warning and its affiliates have no responsibility for the views, opinions and information communicated here. The contributor(s) and news providers
are fully responsible for this content. In addition, the views and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of World Wide Warning or its affiliates.
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted (C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in the 'fair use doctrine'. It is distributed without profit.
